Chemexcil Logo Chemexcil Chemexcil
 
left
navright

News


Latest News


Product Categories

  • Cosmetics, Toiletries, Soaps, Detergents & Essential Oils

    Cosmetics, Toiletries, Soaps, Detergents & Essential Oils

    Basic Inorganic and Organic Chemicals incl Agro Chemicals

    Basic Inorganic and Organic Chemicals incl Agro Chemicals

    Speciality Chemicals, Lubricants And Castor oil

    Speciality Chemicals, Lubricants And Castor oil

    Dyes & Dye Intermediates

    Dyes & Dye Intermediates

Home» Circulars» Cbic Cases Where Igst Refund Have Not Been Granted Due To Claiming Higher Rate Of Drawback Or Where Higher Rate And Lower Rate Were Identical

Back
 
CBIC - Cases where IGST refund have not been granted due to claiming higher rate of drawback or where higher rate and lower rate were identical
 

 

CHEMEXCIL
Basic Chemicals, Cosmetics & Dyes Export Promotion Council
(Set-up by Ministry of Commerce and Industry, Govt of India)

Jhansi Castle, 4th Floor, 7, Cooperage Road, Mumbai - 400 001. India

Tel : +91 22 22021288 Website : www.//chemexcil.in

 


 

EPC/LIC/CBIC/DBK                                                                                 09/10/2018

 

ALL  MEMBERS OF THE COUNCIL

        

CBIC

 

Cases where IGST refund have not been granted due to claiming

 

higher rate of drawback or where higher rate and lower rate were identical

 

 

 

Dear Members,

 

The Central Board of Indirect Taxes & Customs (CBIC) has issued   Circular no 37/2018 dated 09-10-2018  regarding  cases where IGST refund have not been granted due to claiming higher rate of drawback or where higher rate and lower rate were identical.

 

 

We understand from the CBIC circular,  that  numerous representations have been received from exporters /export associations, regarding cases where IGST refunds have not been granted because higher rate of drawback has been claimed or where higher rate and lower rate were identical.

 

The important points from  above  circular are reproduced as  follows for your information:

 

  • Ø The legal provisions related  to Drawback claims are as under:
  •  
  •                                i.            Notes and condition as amended  by Notf. No.59/2017-Cus(NT) dated 29.6.2017), under which All Industry Rates of Drawback had been notified and which were applicable for availing composite rates during period in question (i.e. 1.7.2017 to 30.9.2017), prescribed that 'The rates and caps of drawback specified in columns (4) and (5) of the said Schedule shall not be applicable to export of a commodity or product if such commodity or product is —

(d) exported claiming refund of the integrated goods and services tax paid on such exports'.

  •                              ii.            Notes and Condition as amended by Notfn.No.59/2017-Cus(NT) dated 29.6.2017 and 73/2017-Cus(NT) dated 26.7.2017) prescribed that 'The rates and caps of drawback specified in columns (4) and (5) of the said Schedule shall be applicable to export of a commodity or product if the exporter satisfies the following conditions, namely :-

(ii) If the goods are exported on payment of integrated goods and services tax, the exporter shall declare that no refund of integrated goods and services tax paid on export product shall be claimed;

 

  • Ø In terms of Rules 12 and 13 of the Customs. Central Excise Duties and Service Tax  Drawback Rules, 1995, the shipping bill itself is treated as claim for drawback in terms of the declarations made on the shipping bill. 
  •  
  • Ø The declarations required in terms of above Notes and Conditions and provisions of the  Drawback Rules are made electronically in the EDI System. When composite drawback rate was claimed  (by declaring suffix A or C with Drawback serial number), exporter was required to tick DBK002 and DBK003 declarations in the shipping bills. In fact, for period 1.7.2017 to 26.7.2017, a manual declaration was also required to be given as the changes made on 26.7.2017 were made applicable for exports made from 1.7.2017 onwards.

 

Ø By declaring drawback serial number suffixed with A or C and by making above stated  declarations, the exporters consciously relinquished their IGST/ITC claims.

 

Ø It has been noted that exporters had availed the option to take drawback at higher rate in place of IGST refund out of their own -volition. Considering the fact that exporters have made aforesaid declaration while claiming the higher rate of drawback, it has been decided that it would not be justified allowing exporters to avail IGST refund after initially claiming the benefit of higher drawback. There is no justification for re-opening the issue at this stage.

 

 

Members are requested to take note of this clarification.  The original circular is available for reference using below link-

 

  

37/2018

View (663 KB)

 

09-10-2018

Cases where IGST refund have not been granted due to claiming higher rate of drawback or where higher rate and lower rate were identical

 

http://cbic.gov.in/htdocs-cbec/customs/cs-circulars/cs-circulars-2018/Circular-37-2018-Customs.pdf

 

 

 

 

Thanking you.

 

Yours faithfully,

 

 

S.G BHARADI

EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR

CHEMEXCIL

left
Site visited: Web Site Hit Counters
navright
Disclaimer: The translation into various languages is provided for the benefit of visitors. Chemexcil is not responsible for any wrong interpretations/mistakes.
For authenticated information in this site, please contact info@chemexcil.in
Copyright © 2014. All Rights Reserved by Chemexcil
Powered by: iBongo